A Preliminary Discussion of Selection and Breeding for Resistance to Thrips and other Insect Predators in Daylilies
My breeding program began in 2010, with the first major round of seed production happening in 2011. Even before I had started my program, as I planned the program I would pursue in 2008 and 2009, I planned to select for resistance to pests and pathogens, because that mirrored the work I had previously done with poultry (immunogenetics), and was an area of interest for me. Having grown daylilies since the mid 1970s, I had always noticed the frequent spottiness of flowers in anthocyanin pigmented types. I also noticed problem behaviors like bud drop, enations, spottiness and even fully blasted young scapes. Until I began to consider a daylily breeding program, I had not looked at the causes of all these problems, but I repeatedly found references to thrips issues. I knew there were thrips endemic to my very dry, south-facing property with sandy soil - thrips heaven! So I knew rust and thrips would be two major areas of selection for me, but I was not able to start selecting effectively for either within the first couple of years of my program. Rust didn’t not appear until the late summer of 2012, and I did not have a major thrips outbreak until the very dry spring of 2013. I knew that because rust is not endemic to my area, I would make my rust resistance selection time period coincide with the time when I would be brining in the most new plant material to build my daylily breeding program. I let the near-certainty of getting rust when buying a lot of daylilies from a lot of different sources become an asset rather than a problem. However, I set my rust resistance breeding program for five years, at which time I cut back on bringing in plants and the last few plants I brought in went through quarantine and never produced any rust. I haven’t brought in new plants since 2019.
Before I proceed to speak about my own thrips resistance selection program, I want to mention that I know some people feel that Aphids are responsible for things attributed to thrips. In my garden, I only rarely see aphids, but I do see thrips, and issues like enations, bud drop, flower deformity and spotting of petal pigmentation all increase when thrips swarms occur here (generally in dry spring weather). I do not see as many issues with thrips in the late summer and fall. They are predominantly a spring issue here. With that said though, while I know thrips are what I am working with, I do believe that any sap-feeding insect with a proboscis can likely cause all of these same issues, so I am completely open to other insect pests such as aphids causing these same issues in other gardens. I do not believe this is an either/or proposition, but that the symptoms I have described above can be attributed to ‘insect predators’, generally, rather than having to say that these issues are diagnostic of one particular insect predator. I will use ‘thrips’ and ‘insect predators’ interchangeably, but acknowledge that the culprit may not be thrips in someone else's garden. I believe the methods I am using will work in selection for any insect predation, and I would not be surprised if the resistance factors I am observing for thrips may work for more than one genera of predator insects. But even if each type of insect has to have specific resistance to deter them, the manner of locating resistant individuals with breeding value and selecting for resistance would be pretty much the same. That allows this article to be useful to anyone having an insect issue who might want to breed for natural resistance to insect predators. My specific references here will apply to what I am selecting for, but you can use the process to select resistance to whatever you choose.
At times in my life while growing daylilies as garden flowers, we would have dry years, and I would notice that flowers of dark colored and red cultivars often looked deformed and spotty. I just assumed it was drought related, and of course it was. To be specific, I would later learn that times of drought produce thrips swarms in my garden. I was graphically reminded of how bad that can get in the spring of 2013, and again in 2014 and 2015. We have actually had a series of ‘perfect storm’ springs throughout much of the past decade + that have a combination of late, hard freezes in April/May, drought in April/May/June, and then the resultant thrips swarm during the drought. I knew I would be selecting for “thrips resistance” from reading old articles about daylilies. I tried to find plants to purchase with resistance to thrips, but never found any that were known, proven quantities for such, though I did find a few rust resistant cultivars at the start. When those first drought years hit, that gave me a chance to begin to select for cultivars that performed the best in these conditions. At first I wasn’t specifically doing “thrips resistance selection”. I simply marked the plants that performed normally or close to normally. In those first years - 2013 through 2015 - I culled thousands of plants for a total absence of resistance - what I refer to as either a “thrips meltdown” or, depending on your pronouns, an “insect predation meltdown”.
Such a meltdown can be characterized by the following behaviors - 50%+ bud drop, blasted scapes with no intact buds, extreme enation deformity of buds resulting in severally deformed flowers (especially sepals), and heavy spotting and pigment loss in petal pigmentation. During that period I also set out to confirm that I was seeing thrips instead of another insect predator, which I did to my satisfaction. One important thing that I observed is that the issue of thrips is most extreme in the early-early and early season, moderating some in midseason, and showing little impact in late season in my garden. Early-early and early flowering cultivars have consistently been the worst effected and the hardest area to find plants to breed from, to the extent that I almost gave up on the early season entirely. Luckily, I found a few plants in the early part of the season that showed exceptional resistance and have been able to work from them in establishing early season types that perform well in areas with late freezes and insect predation issues.
From the year 2013 through 2015, I was not really breeding for thrips resistance, but was, first and foremost, confirming that there even was resistance to the thrips (and whatever other combination of factors were involved, such as late freeze tolerance and drought tolerance), and secondly, if any suspected resistance I might locate was genetic and heritable. What I found was surprising. First, no daylily I tested has ever shown immunity to thrips/thrip-related-issues. Second, those that do show high resistance are extremely rare, far rarer in fact than plants with high rust resistance. By 2016 I had identified a tiny handful of highly thrips resistant cultivars and seedlings and experimental breeding started in earnest. That was eight years ago as of this writing (2024). I feel that I am now in a position to make some preliminary assessments of the project. The most important thing is that there is a strong correlation between high resistance and breeding ability, implying that resistance is genetic and heritable. The key, then, becomes to identify plants with exceptional thrips resistance to begin with. That is easily done in gardens that become dry and also have endemic thrips populations. For other insects, under the right conditions for those insects, selection for resistant individuals should be possible.
The next most important thing is to consider the genetic makeup of the resistance trait. To begin, about 15% of daylilies in my garden showed some resistance to thrips. They were not immune, nor did they show exceptional resistance, but they did not suffer “thrips meltdown”. I found fewer than ten cultivars/seedlings that showed exceptional resistance to thrips, and oddly, most of the resistance was in tetraploids, with almost no diploids showing exceptional resistance. Further, I have located no species types that show exceptional resistance (or really, much resistance at all) to thrips. H. vespertina appears to have some resistance, but that may only because it flowers so late in the season. However, I believe that, much like exceptional rust resistance, exceptional thrips resistance is a concentration of multiple genetic factors.
Because there is something of a bell-curve in observable thrips resistance, that further supports a quantitative trait. In breeding, we see mixed results. Of the resistant individual plants that I identified, breeding experiments were not immediately straightforward. In some instances, resistance appeared to be recessive, not showing up in the F1 seedlings, while the same cultivar, in another cross, would appear to be expressing the resistance trait as a dominant or partially dominant trait. I suspect this implies that the alternate partner in the later scenario was carrying enough recessive genes complimentary to the resistance genes of the resistant parent that resistance appeared in some of the seedlings as an apparent (observable) trait. This further implies that at least some, if not all, of the genes involved are recessive, though some may be dosage specific dominants that have low penetrance in heterozygotes, especially so in tetraploids.
So I think that thrips resistance, and perhaps insect predator resistance in general, may be a multigenic, recessive trait - a complex of multiple recessive genes. That makes a program hard to get going (which may explain why there is so much thrips susceptibility in Hemerocallis), but once the genes become concentrated into homozygosity they are very effective and appear with high regularity in the subsequent generations. Recessive traits are hard to work with initially, but once you concentrate your lines with those recessive genes, first as heterozygotes and then later as homozygotes, you see the trait with increasing frequency in subsequent generations of seedlings. However, what it does make more difficult is outcrosses. Once you have a line set for a complex of recessive traits, outcrossing will see the trait “vanish” in the F1 outcross to the unselected gene pool, and it will require either backcrossing to the resistant line or interbreeding siblings to start to bring the trait back out and visibly present. When working with heterozygotes for a multigenic recessive trait, backcrossing to a homozygote for the said trait complex will result in the maximum number of homozygotes (which will still be low, especially in tetraploids), while sibling mating will result in fewer homozygotes, but can produce a few.
In my experience, the most effective strategy is to cross any exceptionally resistant individuals you can find with each other, and cross your fingers while your at it. They won’t always match up their genes perfectly, and so even in that instance, you may not get a crop of seedlings where all show resistance as high as the parents, but a few might, and in rare instances, you might get a full crop of very good to exceptionally resistant seedlings. The next best strategy (one I have used a lot, and that I think is the most practical) is to cross an exceptionally resistant individual with a very good to highly resistant individual. In more practical language, you cross the best with those that are just a bit less in regards to resistance. These crosses usually produce a crop where the majority are at the level of the less resistant parent, but a few may be more resistant or even exceptional, and all will carry the genes of the more resistant parent and can be backcrossed to that parent or another exceptionally resistant cultivar.
The third type of cross is the ‘salvage cross’ where you cross an exceptionally resistant individual with an individual showing poor or no resistance. This type of cross can be very frustrating, as the entire crop will tend to show poor resistance, but will carry resistance genes. In rare instance, the poorly resistant parent may have carried some of the resistance genes in a heterozygous state, and so a few seedlings within the cross may be more resistant than the poorly resistant parent. Pick those if they occur! However, my experience is that this is very rare, and even then, the “more resistant” seedling(s) rarely show resistance near that of the exceptional parent. The key with all the crosses is to not expect much in the F1 and to take the best of the F1 back to something of high or exceptional resistance, be patience, observe minutia and persist with selection and mating best to best, once you have a few exceptional resistant individuals to work with.
Selection for rust resistance is much easier than selection for thrips resistance, but I would never have been able to make rust resistance selection the center of my program simply due to my location, and there are a good number of daylilies that show rust resistance. I do not have endemic rust, but I absolutely have endemic thrips, and in my environment those “perfect storms” of late freezes and spring drought create frequent and recurring opportunities to make this type of selection, simply by doing nothing but making the observations, and then making breeding decisions based upon those observations. I don’t have to “bring in” thrips and bad weather. So since 2016, thrips resistance selection has become one of the central focuses within my program, building upon the initial observations and culling through the years of 2013 - 2015.
However, it is important to stress that just because this type of selection is a central focus, that does not mean all my introductions show exceptional thrips resistance. At this point, I have three introductions (listed below at the end of this article) that are truly exceptional in terms of their thrips resistance. All my introductions have been screened for thrips resistance, but because almost no daylilies show much resistance to thrips, and it is a slow breeding process due to the nature of the genes involved, I am only now beginning to see lines forming where the majority of the seedlings are showing extremely high to truly exceptional thrips resistance. What I have done in my selection process is to eliminate all those cultivars and seedlings that were very susceptible, while retaining those that are above average, but above average doesn’t mean immune or exceptional, it just means better than average. Selection only works within the parameters of what is available. The majority of my introductions show some thrips susceptibility, but all have been selected to eliminate high susceptibility, and so all my introductions are the most thrips resistant/late spring freeze tolerant of their own seedling group. Such plants likely carry some genes for resistance, but are not highly concentrated for the trait, as in exceptional individuals.
My breeding program is based in twenty-year increments, and I fully expect to have lines with exceptional thrips resistance, and introductions from such lines, by the time I reach the first twenty-year mark within my program. That is only about six years away at this point. With many of my introductions to date, I have been attempting to spread the best rust resistance plants/genes I was able to locate and concentrate within my breeding work, and so I felt it important to introduces such plants to be of benefit to Southern growers who may want to grow rust resistant plants or even breed for rust resistance, even if the thrips resistance was not at the level I would have preferred. I can say that that all of my introduction have been selected to remove high thrips susceptibility and so all are average or above average for the trait when compared to the general daylily gene pool.
Over the last couple of years I have begun to consistently produce the level of thrips resistance I want to see within certain lines, and it is clear to me that I am both recognizing the best breeders for the trait and concentrating the genes in my tetraploid breeding lines. Complex traits such as thrips resistance cannot easily be merely selected for within a random population, because the genes in homozygous combinations are so rare and the genes are so hard to identify in heterozygotes, so they have to be selected for over time through an understanding of how the genes work, identification of exceptional breeding material and concentration of desired genes over multiple generations. In common language, “it’s not easy”, but it can be done with patience, observation and singular focus.
So in closing, I want to give you a list of the exceptional cultivars for thrips resistance that I have been able to identify, in case anyone wants to begin to integrate the trait into their programs. I suspect there should be a few more exceptional cultivars out there somewhere. To identify them, just don’t spray your plants in thrips swarms and watch what happens. Those that remain unaffected, even when thrips or whatever insect predator are swarming all over the plants and flowers, are likely to have resistance and are the place you want to start with selection. Keep observing such plants year after year and cross such plants with other plants showing apparent moderate to high thrips resistance. Observe the seedlings. Once you have identified a plant that is both showing exceptional resistance and can produce seedlings showing exceptional resistance (even in only in the F2, depending what you crossed it with), then you have something to work from, and your breeding and selection for this type of resistance can proceed.
Thrips Resistant Individuals
(These are cultivars that I have identified within my own program as showing exceptional thrips resistance/late spring freeze tolerance and having breeding value for the trait)
From other hybridizers:
Solaris Symmetry
Spider Man
Whooperee
Small World Hip-Hop Music
Tis Midnight
From my own introductions:
Samwise The Brave
Misty Mountains Cold
Sun Dragon